Many writers, whether published or just starting out, are very nervous that someone else will steal their work, whether that be another writer using their ideas in their own stories, or someone making pirated copies of their books. When I put out a collection of my writing, I specifically gave permission for anyone at all to copy my ideas, or even to cut and paste whole stories. I also contacted the Pirate Party, a worldwide network that wants to lessen copyright, and told them that I was giving anyone permission to put my ebook on file-sharing sites. In this post I hope to show why I went against common wisdom.

Creative Commons

I used a free service called Creative Commons. Creative Commons is useful for people who want to give the general public permission to use their work, but with restrictions. In my case I didn’t mind people using my work for non-profit purposes, such as posting on a blog, but I didn’t want to allow anyone to make money off it. Similarly I wanted anyone who used it to give me credit. I could have just listed these things myself. However I’m not a lawyer, and perhaps I would have worded it wrong so that someone could twist what I said to do more than I meant. Also I could have been unclear about what I was allowing and what I wasn’t allowing. Sure, someone could email me and ask, but the whole purpose of having a written statement is so that people don’t have to ask.

Creative Commons has a series of different licenses, which give permission to do different things. They’re all legally ‘tight’, and they’re all summarized in plain language. So all you have to do is go to their site and answer a series of questions, to get to the license that does what you want. In my case I used the Attribution Non-Commercial License.

Why?

That’s what I did. But why? Common sense would suggest that I’m giving something away for free that I could be selling. However I believe that, in the long run, I’ll be better off. The main reason is that I’ve seen how many people are, like me, trying to get their writing out there. Go to Smashwords and have a look at the latest ebooks. Then refresh the page ten minutes later, and you’ll probably see a whole new lot. The problem that new writers face isn’t that people want to steal your work; it’s getting anyone to show an interest in your work at all. If someone passes on a pirated copy of my work, it might get to someone who’s prepared to buy it – and that someone would probably have never heard of me otherwise. Even if they don’t want to pay for what they read, I might come out with something else in the future, and perhaps paying 99c for it will be easier than hunting it down on a file-sharing site.

Science fiction writer Andrew Burt tells the story of someone who disliked his book, and to get back at him decided to put a copy on a file-sharing site. The effect was that he got a small ‘spike’ in sales immediately afterwards.

I also have some less selfish motives. Many people would assume that the purpose of copyright is to protect authors and creators. Leaving aside the fact that someone else often ends up with the rights (how many Disney shareholders created any of the Disney characters? How many shareholders in Microsoft have ever written a line of code?), that doesn’t seem to have been the intention in the past. The US Constitution says that Congress has the power “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” Note that protecting ‘intellectual property’ isn’t mentioned. The authors of the Constitution seemed to see the point as getting ideas out there where people can use them: almost the exact opposite of keeping them ‘safe’ and ‘protected’.

The original idea of copyright seems to have been a sort of deal: you have an idea, and we want you to get it out into the world where it will do some good. To encourage you to do that, we’ll give you a monopoly on its use for a limited time. After that, anybody can use it (it will enter the ‘public domain’).

A lot of people don’t know that copyright used to give a lot less protection than it does now, especially in the United States. In the US, it used to be that works were copyrighted for a maximum of 56 years. Today copyright in the US can last for over 100 years. In fact Congress keeps extending the time. In practice, they’re acting as if they never want ideas to go into the public domain.

This is great for the owners of ‘intellectual property’. But it’s hard to see how this “promotes the Progress of Science and useful Arts,” or how forever is a “limited time.” In a sense it’s a theft from the public. Anyone who publishes work has accepted the deal that the law offers, of a limited monopoly in return for making their idea known. Congress has been giving them more and more extensions on that monopoly, but doesn’t require them to do anything to earn it.

It probably doesn’t matter that much that Disney still owns Mickey Mouse, or that Lord of the Rings is still under copyright. But remember that these laws don’t just apply to the arts. Similar laws apply to science as well. So a life-saving invention could be going unused, because its owner wants too much money for it, or because it’s tied up in court while two companies fight about who owns it.

Conclusion

I’m far from an expert on either the law or the publishing industry. However I hope that I’ve given you, especially those of you who might be thinking about publishing some writing, a different take on the whole issue of whether authors should worry about their ideas being stolen. At least I hope I’ve shown you that there’s a different way of thinking about it, and that that way doesn’t require you to just give up on making money; in fact that it might be more profitable as well as better for society.

—————–

About the Author: James Hutchings lives in Melbourne, Australia. He fights crime as Poetic Justice, but his day job is acting. You might know him by his stage-name ‘Brad Pitt.’ He specializes in short fantasy fiction. His work has appeared in Daily Science Fiction, fiction365 and Enchanted Conversation among other markets. His ebook collection The New Death and others is now available from Amazon, Smashwords and Barnes & Noble. He blogs daily at Teleleli.

—————-

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License.

I ignored the YA section of the bookstore for most of my life, believing those books were strictly for teens. That prejudice ended with the Harry Potter phenomenon. I know, I know. HP isn’t quite YA, but stick with me.

Suddenly, grown-ups everywhere were seen reading HP novels in coffee shops, on airplanes, and at beaches. Whatever stigma had been associated with adults reading children’s books disappeared overnight. I happily joined this movement, as did millions of others.

With my resistance broken down, I didn’t think twice about trying a couple young adult novels I’d been hearing about. I bought, read and endlessly recommended both Little Brother by Cory Doctorow and Twilight by you know who. It wasn’t long before I started to prefer YA.

Why do these YA stories resonate with me, a grown man, several rings out from the bullseye of the target market age?

I believe it’s because authors don’t write these books for teens; they write them about teens. The condition of being a teen is one of in-between-ness: between childhood and adulthood, between dependence and independence, innocence and worldliness. If you’re a teen, the adults in your life don’t quite view you as an equal, and yet you no longer identify with children. You’re stuck.

The struggle to get out of the the in-between-ness causes endless angst. It’s amidst this glorious angst that some of the juiciest stories happen.

Here’s my theory: YA stories are myths about the journey teens must take to reach adulthood. Teens love these stories because they see their own struggles in them. But if you accept my theory, YA stories are as much about adulthood as they are about teenagerhood. And that’s why they appeal to adults.

Maybe these stories provide some wish fulfillment, like an opportunity to relive one’s teens and make different choices. Or maybe the appeal is that adults feel some paternal or maternal instinct toward the young characters.

I think it’s more than that.

In my opinion, all that distinguishes an adult from a teen is the collected sediment of years. If you scrape away the layers of cynicism and world-weariness, many adults are still teens at heart. I know I still struggle with authority, with the opinions of my peers, and I suffer continued disillusionment as one more thing I was certain was true turns out to be false.

So why I do I read YA?

It’s because, despite the fact I’m in my fourth decade, I’m still making the transition from childhood to adulthood.

P.S. And that might also be the reason I write YA.